2 Peter 1:7

Authorized King James Version

PDF

And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity.

Original Language Analysis

ἐν to G1722
ἐν to
Strong's: G1722
Word #: 1 of 12
"in," at, (up-)on, by, etc
δὲ And G1161
δὲ And
Strong's: G1161
Word #: 2 of 12
but, and, etc
τῇ G3588
τῇ
Strong's: G3588
Word #: 3 of 12
the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in english idiom)
εὐσεβείᾳ godliness G2150
εὐσεβείᾳ godliness
Strong's: G2150
Word #: 4 of 12
piety; specially, the gospel scheme
τὴν G3588
τὴν
Strong's: G3588
Word #: 5 of 12
the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in english idiom)
φιλαδελφίᾳ brotherly kindness G5360
φιλαδελφίᾳ brotherly kindness
Strong's: G5360
Word #: 6 of 12
fraternal affection
ἐν to G1722
ἐν to
Strong's: G1722
Word #: 7 of 12
"in," at, (up-)on, by, etc
δὲ And G1161
δὲ And
Strong's: G1161
Word #: 8 of 12
but, and, etc
τῇ G3588
τῇ
Strong's: G3588
Word #: 9 of 12
the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in english idiom)
φιλαδελφίᾳ brotherly kindness G5360
φιλαδελφίᾳ brotherly kindness
Strong's: G5360
Word #: 10 of 12
fraternal affection
τὴν G3588
τὴν
Strong's: G3588
Word #: 11 of 12
the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in english idiom)
ἀγάπην charity G26
ἀγάπην charity
Strong's: G26
Word #: 12 of 12
love, i.e., affection or benevolence; specially (plural) a love-feast

Analysis & Commentary

And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity. Peter concludes the virtue list with two relational qualities. "Brotherly kindness" (philadelphia, φιλαδελφία) denotes the warm affection and loyalty characteristic of family bonds, applied to fellow believers. The early church's radical unity across ethnic, economic, and social barriers astonished the pagan world. This familial love for fellow Christians demonstrates that godliness (v. 6) isn't isolated mysticism but community-shaping devotion.

To brotherly kindness add "charity" (agapē, ἀγάπη)—the distinctive Christian love that extends beyond natural affection to sacrificial, self-giving commitment modeled by Christ (John 13:34-35; 15:13). While philadelphia focuses on fellow believers, agapē encompasses all people, including enemies (Matt 5:44). This is the summit of Christian virtue—God-like love that gives without calculation of return, loves the unlovely, and seeks others' good at personal cost.

The progression from faith (v. 5) to love (v. 7) mirrors Paul's triad of faith, hope, and love (1 Cor 13:13), with love as the greatest. Authentic faith necessarily produces love; profession without love exposes spurious faith (1 John 4:20). Peter's list brackets moral transformation (virtue, self-control) and theological growth (knowledge) within relational love, revealing that Christianity is fundamentally about loving God and neighbor. This directly counters false teachers whose doctrine produces division, selfishness, and exploitation (2:1-3, 13-14) rather than sacrificial love.

Historical Context

In the ancient world, loyalty to one's ethnic group, social class, or philosophical school was common, but the Christian call to love all believers across traditional boundaries was revolutionary. Roman society was rigidly stratified; Jewish identity centered on ethnic and religious distinctives separating them from Gentiles. The church's practice of philadelphia—slaves and masters, Jews and Gentiles, men and women united as siblings in Christ—challenged social structures and attracted both converts and persecution.

Agapē love wasn't unknown in Greek literature but was relatively rare compared to erōs (romantic love) or philia (friendship). Christians elevated agapē as supreme, defining it by Christ's self-sacrifice and applying it universally, even to persecutors. This ethic of enemy-love distinguished Christianity from surrounding philosophies and religions. Early church communities practiced radical generosity, caring for widows, orphans, and the poor regardless of social status—a witness to gospel transformation. False teachers undermined this unity by creating factions, exploiting the vulnerable, and promoting selfish indulgence (2:10-14).

Questions for Reflection